December 21, 2006

Sandy Berger Confused Trash Can for Archives File

In case you missed this on CNN (yeah, right), do you ever wonder exactly what it was that Sandy Burger stole from the National Archives involving his and the Clinton administration's failures or cover-ups in fighting terrorism. Do you remember when Berger said that taking the documents was an "honest mistake?" Let's see from a recent release.

Berger Hid Archive Documents

President Clinton's national security adviser removed classified documents from the National Archives, hid them under a construction trailer and later tried to find the trash collector to retrieve them, the agency's internal watchdog said Wednesday.

...Officials told The Associated Press at the time of the thefts that the documents were highly classified and included critical assessments about the Clinton administration's handling of the millennium terror threats as well as identification of America's terror vulnerabilities at airports and seaports.

...Berger took a break to go outside without an escort while it was dark. He had taken four documents in his pockets. "He headed toward a construction area. ... Mr. Berger looked up and down the street, up into the windows of the Archives and the DOJ (Department of Justice), and did not see anyone," the interview notes said. He then slid the documents under a construction trailer, according to the inspector general. Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office. ...The notes said that Berger had "destroyed, cut into small pieces, three of the four documents. These were put in the trash."

Honest mistake. And, O.J.'s killing his wife was an "honest mistake." Yet, the major media will give the Democrats another pass on this, which is why the Democrats are so brazen about their crimes. Berger should have been given serious prison time rather than a misdemeanor charge for lying during the 9-11 investigation and weakening our war on terror. He was supposedly our National Security Advisor under Clinton. What would have been done to a Republican in a similar case?

And, I supppose that Clinton and the Democrats will go on accusing President Bush entirely for 9-11, now that they have destroyed and sanitized the complete record on themselves. What information are we missing? We'll never know.

Posted by Woody M. at December 21, 2006 03:50 PM | TrackBack

Geez! Stupid government! Looking in our trash cans(and below construction site trailers!)...

Posted by jim hitchcock at December 21, 2006 06:51 PM

This is one of the most amazing events of our lifetime, and we barely notice. In most previous wars, Berger would have been executed for this. The Clinton defenders got so used to saying that all the banana republic stuff was just "politics as usual," that eventually they failed to believe even the most corrupt acts.

If you can get the FBI files on your political enemies - if you can block the FBI from investigating a suicide - if you can mislead a Grand Jury and be disbarred, then I guess destroying highest security government documents doesn't mean much.

Posted by Assistant Village Idiot at December 21, 2006 09:10 PM

You're kidding right. The dhimmi's wouldn't lie, steal, obstruct and provide aid and comfort to the enemy that has sworn to kill everyone including the dhimmi's families just to get a vote or two? Sounds like a normal daily practice for the dhimmi's.

Posted by Scrapiron at December 21, 2006 11:17 PM

I want to know what's in Hillary's file box that never left her side while Bill was Prez. I want to know what's in that box pertaining to Sandy Berger that would make him risk serious prison time by stealing classified documents from a National Archive to help keep someone else's image intact. I'm willing to bet the farm that box contains dirt on every single person that was unfortunate enough to get involved with the Clintons.

Doesn't anyone wonder why everyone seems to be so "loyal" to the Clintons still to this day? Even after all the scandals and bad behavior? It's unsettling.

I know, I sound like a conspiracy nut.

Posted by Oyster at December 22, 2006 06:31 AM

What's in the box? We could ask Vince Foster.

Posted by Woody at December 22, 2006 11:31 AM

Oppose Harry Reid

Christians Against Leftist Heresy


I Stand With Piglet, How About You?

Reject The UN
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


101st Fighting Keyboardists

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!

Naked Bloggers

Improper Blogs

Milblogs I Read

The Texas Connection
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

American Conservative

The Wide Awakes


< TR>
AgainstTerrorism 1.jpg
[ Prev || Next || Prev 5 || Next 5]
[Rand || List || Stats || Join]

Open Tracback Providers

No PC Blogroll

Blogs For Bush

My Technorati Profile
Major Media Links

Grab A Button
If you would like to link to GM's Corner, feel free to grab one of the following buttons. (Remember to save the image to your own website).

Whimsical Creations by GM Roper
My Store

Technorati search

Fight Spam! Click Here!
YCOP Blogs

The Alliance
"GM's Corner is a Blogger's
Blog, and then some!"
-----Glenn Reynolds

Coalition Against Illegal Immigration

Southern Blog Federation

Kim Komando, America's Digital Goddess
Powered by:
Movable Type 2.64

Template by:

Design by:

Hosted by: