July 30, 2007
If the Presidential Election Were Re-held
If you had to vote for President all over again, given the choices and even what we know now from 2004, would you vote for Bush or that French guy?
This is how the election came out:
These were our choices:
Images from Respublica and Zete-Tic
Think we have problems now? Maybe we would be going along with U.N. resolution number 426 condemning Hussein, and the U.N. still taking bribes if this country had gone the other way. Think of the Supreme Court justices that we would have gotten rather than what we have. Think of the taxes that would have been added and the negative impact of those on the economy.
I have a lot of problems with President Bush, but nothing compared to what might have been. When people want to bash Bush, remember the other choice that we had--no choice.
(Note: This post is not from G.M., who may have a varying viewpoint.)
Posted by Woody M. at July 30, 2007 10:00 AM | TrackBackAbsolutely concur.
I suspect Bush and his bride will be delighted to leave the White House. The next occupant will square away all his failings and errors, right?
President Clinton, perhaps? President Obama?
I wish Bush had done some different things, but Gen Petraeaus is doing very, very good things now in Iraq. Iraq....AND many other places (A-stan and Pakistan [and it's many "little" stans w/i] are included here) are the fronts.
We must win AND be seen to win in Iraq. Failure will drive the terrorists forward. We can do this, if only we really try. Most, do not seem to be trying. Bush, not a pep-rally speaker, is doing (I believe) his best. The collective WE are more at fault than he. I would throw more rocks at both houses of Congress than the White House. Meanwhile, Gore and Kerry, continue to prove they would have been far worse choices.
Posted by tad at July 30, 2007 10:46 AM
