March 21, 2007
Global Warming Debate - It's Not Over
Some things that you won't see in the major media about global warming....
Just days before former Vice President Al Gore’s scheduled visit to testify about global warming before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, a high profile climate debate between prominent scientists Wednesday evening ended with global warming skeptics being voted the clear winner by a tough New York City before an audience of hundreds of people.Before the start of the nearly two hour debate the audience polled 57.3% to 29.9% in favor of believing that Global Warming was a “crisis”, but following the debate the numbers completely flipped to 46.2% to 42.2% in favor of the skeptical point of view.
...The New York City audience laughed as Gore became the butt of humor during the debate.
...NASA’s Gavin Schmidt, one of the scientists debating for the notion of a man-made global warming "crisis" conceded after the debate that his side was ‘pretty dull’ and was at "a sharp disadvantage." Schmidt made the comments in a March 15 blog posting at RealClimate.org.
One commenter at Jennifer Marohasy's site who has followed this said, "I notice that Gavin Schmidt of the RealClimate site thought they lost the debate because Crichton was so tall and had a greater presence." Remember, "Real Climate" is the site of preference to quote for people who don't know much about AGW but still strongly believe that it is an immediate crisis. And, wasn't Al Gore taller and have more presence than President Bush during their debate when Gore broke protocol and walked over to Bush? We know who won that one, though.
Now, the global warming deceivers are playing "I wish I had said this or thought of that."
Next, for Al Gore's upcoming meeting with a Senate committee....
From behind the scenes on Capitol Hill: Former Vice President Al Gore, despite being given major preferential treatment, has violated the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee’s (EPW) hearing rules....The word on Capitol Hill says not to expect Gore’s testimony to the Senate EPW committee until Wednesday (March 21) -- the day of the hearing. It appears that Gore does not believe the same rules apply to him that apply to every other Senate EPW witness.
The question looms on Capitol Hill: Is Gore delaying the submission of his testimony until the very last moment because he fears it will give members of the EPW committee time to scrutinize it for accuracy?
Gore's getting special treatment is what he expects, as he doesn't believe that he has to follow the same rules as others or the ones that he preaches (See "Al Gore's unility bill.) Maybe if he stands up tall and intimidates the Senate committee members, he can feel that he won.
Posted by Woody M. at March 21, 2007 08:40 AM | TrackBackI see a pattern here. Al Gore wants special treatment in (avoiding) debates, Jimmy Carter wants special treatment in (avoiding) debates, and Bill Clinton wants special treatment in (avoiding) debates.
Posted by Assistant Village Idiot at March 21, 2007 07:34 PM
Of course Real Climate is populated by scientists, while Crighton is a fiction writer. I tend to put more confidence in the combined work of thousands of scientist carried out over the last several decades than a fiction writer with too much imagination and a fear of the left... The scientists may be more boring, but in the end the facts will determine the outcome of this debate.
Posted by Mark at March 22, 2007 10:47 AM
Mark, having facts determine the outcome is exactly what I want--not politics, not consensus, not fear mongering to the public...but, facts.
Unfortunately, the people who are strong believers in AGW manipulate data to fit their hoped for and preconceived beliefs. Facts on AGW take decades to establish and must cover thousands of years, not just one hurricane season or pictures of retreating glaciers.
If Crighton keeps the debate open long enough for people to stop fearing consequences and start considering costs and reality, then Crighton would have done a better job than just winning a debate.
Posted by Woody at March 23, 2007 10:06 AM
York posted this comment, the administrator removed it.
Posted by Skink at March 23, 2007 07:54 PM
York posted this comment, the administrator removed it.
Posted by Skink at March 23, 2007 07:58 PM
York posted this comment, the administrator removed it.
Posted by Skink at March 23, 2007 08:01 PM