January 20, 2007
It Takes the U.N. or Nancy Pelosi for These Ideas
This action by the United Nations must make perfect sense to Nancy Pelosi.
...this is the first all-female peacekeeping team, and participants have said it would have unique advantages in conflict zones. 'Women police are seen to be much less threatening, although they can be just as tough as men. But in a conflict situation, they are more approachable and it makes women and children feel safer,' Seema Dhundia, a unit commander, said recently.
Right. These women may end up doing battle against men and are expected to "be just as tough" and survive? But, the Left says that men (mainly U.S. soldiers) are "baby killers," so these women are expected to make children feel safer. Kids have better instincts than that.
For example, one time my family and I were standing in the front yard when the sound of a loud explosion came from up the road. My youngest son, who was about three at the time, always liked to be picked up by Mom. But, when he was frightened by the loud noise and he wanted security, he ran right past her and leaped into my arms. I'm not tough guy, but instinctively this child knew where to find safety within his family unit.
Well, that doesn't necessarily prove my point and call me sexist, but I can safely say that men provide better fighting and defensive forces than women--unlike Democrats who have talked about drafting our daughters.
Do you think that the Indianapolis Colts would pull QB Peyton Manning and replace him with a cheerleader?
Posted by Woody M. at January 20, 2007 01:00 PM | TrackBackAt last we'lll find out if female UN soldiers are as prone to (I can't use the word here but it involves forcible penetration) and corruption as male blue helmets.
Posted by John Costello at January 20, 2007 05:21 PM