December 28, 2005
The NYTimes - Not Respectable Anymore
My friend Seth, over at Hard Astarboard is angry at the New York Times, as all thinking individuals are and he links his story to the always interesting Michele Malkin. But, Seth says it better than ever I could:
No, New York Times, We're Not Done With You Yet...Anyone who thinks the times isn't a biased lefty rag is obviously not a thinking person! Posted by GM Roper at December 28, 2005 06:23 AM | TrackBack
...and we won't be until everybody in America knows what alying,treasonous,shameless,bogus,idiotarian,leftist propaganda generating, thoroughly liberal-biased source of disinformation you have become, abusing the reputation you earned back in the days when you were a respectable newspaper.Columnist and blogger extraordinaire Michelle Malkin puts in her two cents, as succinct and on-point as always.
The Atlanta paper is Democratic and liberal to the core. Recently, they made attacks against the Republican governor's tax breaks offered to a business to locate in a certain area and create jobs. The paper attacked him, so a representative from the governor's office wrote the editor saying that Cox Communications, owner of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, took advantage of exactly the same tax benefit that the paper criticized. However, when the editor published his letter of response, she conveniently edited it to change the intent and leave that bit of information out. So, the paper says what it wants, even when wrong, and intentionally cuts out information from the other side which writes to expose the truth. Such is journalistic ethics...which is an oxymoron.
Continuing its liberal stream, the AJC's criticism of the Bush administration has grown so great that you can't tell if they're on our side or the side of the terrorists--hence, their new nick-name...the Al Jazeera Constitution.
Posted by Woody at December 28, 2005 09:10 AM
It's nothing new for the NY Times to help our enemies. I was watching "Dr. Strangelove" this evening, including these lines:
[after learning of the Doomsday Machine]
President Merkin Muffley: But this is absolute madness, Ambassador! Why should you *build* such a thing?
Ambassador de Sadesky: There were those of us who fought against it, but in the end we could not keep up with the expense involved in the arms race, the space race, and the peace race. At the same time our people grumbled for more nylons and washing machines. Our doomsday scheme cost us just a small fraction of what we had been spending on defense in a single year. The deciding factor was when we learned that your country was working along similar lines, and we were afraid of a doomsday gap.
President Merkin Muffley: This is preposterous. I've never approved of anything like that.
Ambassador de Sadesky: Our source was the New York Times.
Posted by Woody at December 29, 2005 06:17 PM
