January 28, 2008
I used to cringe when Rush Limbaugh would teasingly call the National Organization of Women (NOW) the NAGs (National Association of Gals). Even though it was funny, my beloved mother was a feminist before Bella Abzug put on her first hat (you youngsters out there will have to ask about that reference). Mom demanded respect for her intellect, for her capabilities and woe be unto the man that didn't give it to her including my dad. Mom once voted for someone dad didn't like and he didn't speak to her for several days. Mom decided to hell with that and quit cooking for him. Dad got the message real quick since his culinary capabilities was pretty much limited to fried egg sandwiches and pouring milk on cereal.
But, this post isn't about mom, it is about the New Yawk Chapter of the NAGS (to use Limbaugh's term). Recently, today in fact, Teddy Kennedy, that bloated bag of gas endorsed Barrak Obama for President. Now, those of you that know me, know that I'm not enamored of any of the Republican's running now that Fred has dropped out, but I'm damn sure not enamored of any of the Democrats especially Shrillary. So, the President of the NEW YAWK chapter got her panties in a knot and released the following:
"Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard. Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him, hushed the fact that he was late in his support of Title IX, the ERA, the Family Leave and Medical Act to name a few. Women have buried their anger that his support for the compromises in No Child Left Behind and the Medicare bogus drug benefit brought us the passage of these flawed bills. We have thanked him for his ardent support of many civil rights bills, BUT women are always waiting in the wings.Wow, NOW, I'd guess that Prez Marcia Pappas can't tell the difference between "men who know what's best for us" and making a political choice because the WOMAN that they want is a political hack."And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not "this" one). ‘They’ are Howard Dean and Jim Dean (Yup! That’s Howard’s brother) who run DFA (that’s the group and list from the Dean campaign that we women helped start and grow). They are Alternet, Progressive Democrats of America, democrats.com, Kucinich lovers and all the other groups that take women’s money, say they’ll do feminist and women’s rights issues one of these days, and conveniently forget to mention women and children when they talk about poverty or human needs or America’s future or whatever.
"This latest move by Kennedy, is so telling about the status of and respect for women’s rights, women’s voices, women’s equality, women’s authority and our ability – indeed, our obligation - to promote and earn and deserve and elect, unabashedly, a President that is the first woman after centuries of men who ‘know what’s best for us.’
What is that you say Roper? Shrillary a HACK? You bet your ass I said it, and most "Honest" Democrats are beginning to realize it too. The number of Democrats that are growing fed up with what most Republicans knew in '92 is growing day by day. I don't know who the Democrats will nominate, and it may well be Hillary, but I'm a tellin ya, almost any Republican except Fred who bowed out and Huckabee who is just another Jimmah Carter could beat Hillary. And if you don't believe that, go ahead and nominate the woman.
Posted at 09:01 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 660 words, total size 4 kb.
Does that include the evil entity otherwise known as McCain about whom certain circles are going clearly insane ?
And by certain circles I mean especially folks at the National Review who have seemingly decided to throw caution to the winds, and check in as permanent guests at the Hotel Outlandish.
"A lot is in the hands of Florida voters today ... God be with you — and us!" --- KJL
As to the NOW madness. What is truly disturbing is the attitude that a woman deserves support for PRESIDENT merely because of what she is. Gender-wise. If this were turned on its head it would be denounced as 'sexism'. In fact sexism is precisely what this nasty foolish little tirade really reveals. While it is amusing to see one set of loons castigate another set of loons, frankly it is getting a little scary.
On the one hand we have progressive idiots caught between asinine political correctness poles, and on the other we have 'conservative' loons praying for devine intervention against a candidate they consider to be a 'deviationist' Great Satan.
With due apologies to Tennyson who would likely be appalled to be dragged into this unseemly mess.
Idiots to the right of them, Idiots to the left of them, Idiots in front of them, Volleyed and thunder'd;No wonder polls indicate such voter 'dissatisfaction'. The 'opinion makers' and much of the 'leadership' are certifiable.
Posted by: dougf at Tuesday, January 29 2008 06:04 AM (16GPT)
Hell hath no fury like a scorned woman. The NAG President acts like the organization was Kennedy's mistress. I'm surprised that she didn't box up all those condemnations and send them to Kennedy's wife.
But, let's cut her some slack. Maybe she's going through the emotions of menopause.
Posted by: Woody at Tuesday, January 29 2008 08:19 AM (Eb/8J)
Posted by: Woody at Tuesday, January 29 2008 11:41 AM (Eb/8J)
Posted by: Ahmed at Tuesday, January 29 2008 04:44 PM (9a4mc)
On a much friendlier note, let me say that Ropers mother sounds an awful lot like my own.
Cheers,
Ahmed
Posted by: Ahmed at Tuesday, January 29 2008 04:59 PM (9a4mc)
Over the past several months, I've gotten to be good friends with a guy named Perry Pemberton of Helenwood, Tn, who is the personal pilot and mechanic of Sen. Howard Baker (and at one time, of Bill Frist). He's been restoring Baker's '62 Galaxie Convertible ( his first campaign car?).
I asked him who the Senator was supporting in the primaries, and Perry said `Well, he was supporting Thompson, being neighbors and good friends and all, but now that he has dropped out he'll probably support McCain.
A little inside info, is all.
Posted by: jim hitchcock at Tuesday, January 29 2008 06:49 PM (D8dPw)
Ahmed, your mom must have been one fine lady. Too bad she raised a liberal
Having said that, there isn't much you can say about Bush that I haven't said myself. He WAS right about Iraq and the war on the islamofascists and I suspect you and I will never agree on that issue. As my uncle Jimmy said in a earlier comment, I don't see anyone much worth supporting at this stage of the game.
One of the differences between you and I, Ahmed, is that for years you liberal types supported and kept in power the slimeball that is the clinton crime family. Now you want to put the onus on republicans and conservatives for Bush, but Bush was running aginst a thief (no controling legal authority - remember that?) and a liar about Vietnam. Given who Bush ran against, he was still the better choice. And you Democrats/Liberals/Progressives are the ones that nominated Gore and Kerry. You have no one but yourselves to blame for 8 years of Bush.
Posted by: GM Roper at Tuesday, January 29 2008 08:41 PM (S60yG)
I'm not sure why you Repubs are so vicious about Clinton. Sure, he diddled a young lady and got cought in a lie, but does that rise to the first inch of the lies about Iraq and the lives that have been lost there?
How in the world can you say that Bush was right on Iraq? Even a rabid republican such as yourself knows, or should know, that we have no business in Iraq, never did, and most likely, never will. Shades of Victorian England, when is it our business as to how other nation want to live. If you want to avenge the 9-11, what nation caused it? Shall I mention Saudi Arabia?
Posted by: James Melbert at Wednesday, January 30 2008 10:41 AM (JGY7O)
James, all Al Gore had to do was to win his home state and there never would have been any controversy. However, you're dellusional when you won't admit that it was Gore who tried to steal Florida rather than Bush, who had the most votes--not even counting the military votes that Gore's attorneys (all in place before voting was over) had thrown out.
On Clinton, his crime was as bad as that as Richard Nixon. All Nixon did was stall an investigation into a political break-in. Clinton raped Juanita Broderick, took advantage of a White House intern, and lied in his depositions so as to deny another woman her rights under a law that he signed. Isn't lying in a federal court and then covering it up as bad as what Nixon did and deserving of impeachment?
I don't like the deaths in Iraq myself. I discussed that with a conservative friend of mine today and wondered aloud where we would be today if Bush had done nothing (like Clinton) and continued to allow Saddam Hussein to continue to disrupt security of our nation and the mideast. He didn't know. I don't know. But, I don't see it being any better today if we had not invaded. Sooner or later, the problem would have had to be handled and should not have been put off another twelve years.
I have less of a problem with a president trying to solve a problem and facing new challenges than with a president ignoring a problem just so that he can pass it on to his successor.
Posted by: Woody at Wednesday, January 30 2008 03:32 PM (Eb/8J)
I don;t think very highly of Kerry and I supported Nader in 2000, I'm also a leftist not a liberal but to claim that Kerry "lied about Vietnam" is to engage in a politics of idiocy which unfortunatley dominates these horserace type contests we're seeing at the moment.
Posted by: Ahmed at Wednesday, January 30 2008 05:07 PM (MesNm)
Kerry can't open his mouth without lying Ahmed. Give me one truth that he made a major campaign issue of in his "war" experiences? His Christmas in Cambodia lie, the one "seared" in his memory. How about the Hat, "I have the hat, I still have the hat" that a special forces guy gave him in Cambodia? Or, how about taking all that fire from the enemy on both sides of the river but yet, not one boat showed any damage at all, but Kerry had a "bruise" from the shelling? Or how about a piece of rice in his ass because he was too close to a cache HE blew up. That is NOT enemy action yet he got a purple heart for that wound. When all of his commanding officers said no to his requests for a purple heart but he still gets them? Come on, you are more honest than that!
Or, how about Rove getting him on the Dick Cavett show 20 years earlier than his race or how about his fraudulent Winter Soldier fiasco or throwing "replicas" of his medals over the white house fence or how about meeting with the North Vietnamese while still in the service. Oh, and how about his claim about beheading and Ghengis Khahn wannabes?
Posted by: GM Roper at Wednesday, January 30 2008 05:36 PM (CglRh)
Posted by: GM Roper at Wednesday, January 30 2008 05:39 PM (CglRh)
Posted by: Ahmed at Wednesday, January 30 2008 06:06 PM (MesNm)
BTW, if John Kerry actually met with the "North Vietnamese" while he was in service as Roper claims then I'd actually gain respect for him. The United States had no business bweing the inheritor to French colonilism, nor did the American people we, as Muhammad Ali put it, have any real beef with the Viet Cong.
Posted by: Ahmed at Wednesday, January 30 2008 06:21 PM (MesNm)
Posted by: jack at Monday, February 14 2011 01:07 AM (O9AOw)
Posted by: FM TRANSMITTER at Monday, December 05 2011 09:36 PM (Q2H2M)
Posted by: Elbert Madin at Monday, February 20 2012 03:41 AM (krTA5)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








