Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich delivered the following remarks to a Jewish National Fund meeting at the Selig Center. I believe they need wide distribution so I offer them in their entirety.  This was originally published `12/22 but is being republished again because it is so important.

Mr. Gingrich:  "I just want to talk to you from the heart for a few minutes and share with you where I think we are.

I think it is very stark. I don't think it is yet desperate, but it is very stark. And if I had a title for today's talk, it would be sleepwalking into a nightmare. 'Cause that's what I think we're doing.

I gave a speech at the American Enterprise Institute Sept. 10 at which I gave an alternative history of the last six years, because the more I thought about how much we're failing, the more I concluded you couldn't just nitpick individual places and talk about individual changes because it didn't capture the scale of the disaster. And I had been particularly impressed by a new book that came out called Troublesome Young Men, which is a study of the younger Conservatives who opposed appeasement in the 1930s and who took on Chamberlain. It's a very revealing book and a very powerful book because we tend to look backwards and we tend to overstate Churchill's role in that period. And we tend to understate what a serious and conscientious and thoughtful effort appeasement was and that it was the direct and deliberate policy of very powerful and very willful people. We tend to think of it as a psychological weakness as though Chamberlain was somehow craven. He wasn't craven. Chamberlain had a very clear vision of the world, and he was very ruthless domestically. And they believed so deeply in avoiding war with Germany that as late as the spring of 1940, when they are six months or seven months into they war, they are dropping leaflets instead of bombs on the Rohr, and they are urging the British news media not to publish anti-German stories because they don't want to offend the German people. And you read this book, and it makes you want to weep because, interestingly, the younger Tories who were most opposed to appeasement were the combat veterans of World War I, who had lost all of their friends in the war but who understood that the failure of appeasement would result in a worse war and that the longer you lied about reality, the greater the disaster.

And they were severely punished and isolated by Chamberlain and the Conservative machine, and as I read that, I realized that that's really where we are today. Our current problem is tragic. You have an administration whose policy is inadequate being opposed by a political left whose policy is worse, and you have nobody prepared to talk about the policy we need. Because we are told if you are for a strong America, you should back the Bush policy even if it's inadequate, and so you end up making an argument in favor of something that can't work. So your choice is to defend something which isn't working or to oppose it by being for an even weaker policy. So this is a catastrophe for this country and a catastrophe for freedom around the world. Because we have refused to be honest about the scale of the problem.
Let me work back. I'm going to get to Iran since that's the topic, but I'm going to get to it eventually. Let me work back from Pakistan. The dictatorship in Pakistan has never had control over Wiziristan. Not for a day. So we've now spent six years since 9/11 with a sanctuary for Al-Qaida and a sanctuary for the Taliban, and every time we pick up people in Great Britain who are terrorists, they were trained in Pakistan.

And our answer is to praise Musharraf because at least he's not as bad as the others. But the truth is Musharraf has not gotten control of terrorism in Pakistan. Musharraf doesn't have full control over his own government. The odds are even money we're going to drift into a disastrous dictatorship at some point in Pakistan. And while we worry about the Iranians acquiring a nuclear weapon, the Pakistanis already have 'em, So why would you feel secure in a world where you could presently have an Islamist dictatorship in Pakistan with a hundred-plus nuclear weapons? What's our grand strategy for that?

Then you look at Afghanistan. Here's a country that's small, poor, isolated, and in six years we have not been able to build roads, create economic opportunity, wean people off of growing drugs. A third of the GDP is from drugs. We haven't been able to end the sanctuary for the Taliban in Pakistan. And I know of no case historically where you defeat a guerrilla movement if it has a sanctuary. So the people who rely on the West are outbribed by the criminals, outgunned by the criminals, and faced with a militant force across the border which practiced earlier defeating the Soviet empire and which has a time horizon of three or four generations. NATO has a time horizon of each quarter or at best a year, facing an opponent whose time horizon is literally three or four generations. It's a total mismatch.

Then you come to the direct threat to the United States, which is Al-Qaida. Which, by the way, we just published polls. One of the sites I commend to you is AmericanSolutions. com. Last Wednesday we posted six national surveys, $428,000 worth of data. We gave it away. I found myself in the unique position of calling Howard Dean to tell him I was giving him $400,000 worth of polling. We have given it away to both Democrats and Republicans. It is fundamentally different from the national news media. When asked the question "Do we have an obligation to defend the United States and her allies?" the answer is 85 percent yes. When asked a further question "Should we defeat our enemies?" - it's very strong language - the answer is 75 percent yes, 75 to 16.

The complaint about Iraq is a performance complaint, not a values complaint.

When asked whether or not Al-Qaida is a threat, 89 percent of the country says yes. And they think you have to defeat it, you can't negotiate with it. So now let's look at Al-Qaida and the rise of Islamist terrorism.

And let's be honest: What's the primary source of money for Al-Qaida? It's you, recirculated through Saudi Arabia. Because we have no national energy strategy, when clearly if you really cared about liberating the United States from the Middle East and if you really cared about the survival of Israel, one of your highest goals would be to move to a hydrogen economy and to eliminate petroleum as a primary source of energy.

Now that's what a serious national strategy would look like, but that would require real change.

So then you look at Saudi Arabia. The fact that we tolerate a country saying no Christian and no Jew can go to Mecca, and we start with the presumption that that's true while they attack Israel for being a religious state is a sign of our timidity, our confusion, our cowardice that is stunning.

It's not complicated. We're inviting Saudi Arabia to come to Annapolis to talk about rights for Palestinians when nobody is saying, "Let's talk about rights for Christians and Jews in Saudi Arabia. Let's talk about rights for women in Saudi Arabia."

So we accept this totally one-sided definition of the world in which our enemies can cheerfully lie on television every day, and we don't even have the nerve to insist on the truth. We pretend their lies are reasonable. This is a very fundamental problem. And if you look at who some of the largest owners of some of our largest banks are today, they're Saudis.

You keep pumping billions of dollars a year into countries like Venezuela, Iran and Saudi Arabia, and Russia, and you are presently going to have created people who oppose you who have lots of money. And they're then going to come back to your own country and finance, for example, Arab study institutes whose only requirement is that they never tell the truth. So you have all sorts of Ph.D.s who now show up quite cheerfully prepared to say whatever it is that makes their funders happy - in the name, of course, of academic freedom. So why wouldn't Columbia host a genocidal madman? It's just part of political correctness. I mean, Ahmadinejad may say terrible things, he may lock up students, he may kill journalists, he may say, "We should wipe out Israel," he may say, "We should defeat the United States," but after all, what has he done that's inappropriate? What has he done that wouldn't be repeated at a Hollywood cocktail party or a nice gathering in Europe?

And nobody says this is totally, utterly, absolutely unacceptable. Why is it that the No.1 threat in intelligence movies is the CIA?

I happened the other night to be watching an old movie, To Live and Die in L.A., which is about counterfeiting. But the movie starts with a Secret Service agent who is defending Ronald Reagan in 1985, and the person he is defending Ronald Reagan from, is a suicide bomber who is actually, overtly a Muslim fanatic. Now, six years after 9/11, you could not get that scene made in Hollywood today.

Just look at the movies. Why is it that the bad person is either a right-wing crazed billionaire, or the CIA as a government agency. Go look at the Bourne Ultimatum. Or a movie like the one that George Clooney made, which was an absolute lie, in which it implied that if you were a reformist Arab prince, that probably the CIA would kill you. It's a total lie. We actually have SEALs protecting people all over the world. We actually risk American lives protecting reformers all over the world, and yet Hollywood can't bring itself to tell the truth, (a) because it's ideologically so opposed to the American government and the American military, and (b), because it's terrified that if it said something really openly, honestly true about Muslim terrorists, they might show up in Hollywood. And you might have somebody killed as the Dutch producer was killed.

And so we're living a life of cowardice, and in that life of cowardice we're sleepwalking into a nightmare.

And then you come to Iran. There's a terrific book. Mark Bowden is a remarkable writer who wrote Black Hawk Down, has enormous personal courage. He's a Philadelphi a newspaper writer, actually got the money out of the Philadelphia newspaper to go to Somalia to interview the Somalian side of Black Hawk Down. It's a remarkable achievement. Tells a great story about getting to Somalia, paying lots of cash, having the local warlord protect him, and after about two weeks the warlord came to him and said, "You know, we've decided that we're very uncomfortable with you being here, and you should leave."

And so he goes to the hotel, where he is the only hard-currency guest, and says, "I've got to check out two weeks early because the warlord has told me that he no longer will protect me." And the hotel owner, who wants to keep his only hard-currency guest, says, "Well, why are you listening to him? He's not the government. There is no government ." And Bowden says, "Well, what will I do?" And he says, "You hire a bigger warlord with more guns," which he did. But then he could only stay one more week because he ran out of money.

But this is a guy with real courage. I mean, imagine trying to go out and be a journalist in that kind of world, OK? So Bowden came back and wrote Guest of the Ayatollah, which is the Iranian hostage of 1979, which he entitled, "The First Shots in Iran's War Against America." So in the Bowden worldview, the current Iranian dictatorship has been at war with the United States since 1979. Violated international law. Every conceivable tenet of international law was violated when they seized the American Embassy and they seized the diplomats. Killed Americans in Lebanon in the early '80s. Killed Americans at Khobar Towers in '95 and had the Clinton administration deliberately avoid revealing the information, as Louis Freeh, the director of the FBI, has said publicly, because they didn't want to have to confront the Iranian complicity.

And so you have an Iranian regime which is cited annually as the leading supporter of state terrorism in the world. Every year the State Department says that. It's an extraordinary act of lucidity on the part of an institution which seeks to avoid it as often as possible.

And you have Gen. Petraeus come to the U.S. Congress and say publicly in an open session, "The Iranians are waging a proxy war against Americans in Iraq."

I was so deeply offended by this, it's hard for me to express it without sounding irrational. I'm an Army brat. My dad served 27 years in the infantry. The idea that an American general would come to the American Congress, testify in public that our young men and women are being killed by Iran, and we have done nothing, I find absolutely abhorrent.

So I'm preparing to come and talk today. I got up this morning, and a friend had sent me yesterday's Jerusalem Post editorial, which if you haven't read, I recommend to you. It has, for example, the following quote: "On Monday, chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said, 'The problem of the content of the document setting out joint principles for peace-making post-Annapolis has not been resolved. One of the more pressing problems is the Zionist regime's insistence on being recognized as a Jewish state. We will not agree to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. There is no country in the world where religious and national identities are intertwined.' "

What truly bothers me is the shallowness and the sophistry of the Western governments, starting with our own. When a person says to you, "I don't recognize that you exist," you don't start a negotiation. The person says, "I literally do not recognize" and then lies to you. I mean the first thing you say to this guy is "Terrific. Let's go visit Mecca. Since clearly there's no other state except Israel that is based on religion, the fact that I happen to be Christian won't bother anybody." And then he'll say, "Well, that's different."

We tolerate this. We have created our own nightmare because we refuse to tell the truth. We refuse to tell the truth to our politicians. Our State Department refuses to tell the truth to the country. If the president of the United States, and again, we're now so bitterly partisan, we're so committed to red-vs.-blue hostility, that George W. Bush doesn't have the capacity to give an address from the Oval Office that has any meaning for half the country. And the anti-war left is so strong in the Democratic primary that I think it's almost impossible for any Democratic presidential candidate to tell the truth about the situation.

And so the Republicans are isolated and trying to defend incompetence. The Democrats are isolated and trying to find a way to say, "I'm really for strength as long as I can have peace, but I'd really like to have peace, except I don't want to recognize these people who aren't very peaceful."

I just want to share with you, as a grandfather, as a citizen, as a historian, as somebody who was once speaker of the House; this is a serious national crisis. This is 1935 or 1936, and it's getting worse every year.

None of our enemies are confused. Our enemies don't get up each morning and go, "Oh, gosh, I think I'll have an existential crisis of identity in which I will try to think through whether or not we can be friends while you're killing me." Our enemies get up every morning and say, "We hate the West. We hate freedom." They would not allow a meeting with women in the room.

I was once interviewed by a BBC reporter, a nice young lady who was only about as anti-American as she had to be to keep her job. Since it was a live interview, I turned to her halfway through the interview and I said, "Do you like your job?" And it was summertime, and she's wearing a short-sleeve dress. And she said, "Well, yes." She was confused because I had just reversed roles. I said, "Well, then you should hope we win." She said, "What do you mean?" And I said, "Well, if the enemy wins, you won't be allowed to be on television."

I don't know how to explain it any simpler than that.

Now what do we need?

We need first of all to recognize this is a real war. Our enemies are peaceful when they're weak, are ruthless when they're strong, demand mercy when they're losing, show no mercy when they're winning. They understand exactly what this is, and anybody who reads Sun Tzu will understand exactly what we're living through. This is a total war. One side is going to win. One side is going to lose. You'll be able to tell who won and who lost by who's still standing. Most of Islam is not in this war, but most of Islam isn't going to stop this war. They're just going to sit to one side and tell you how sorry they are that this happened. We had better design grand strategies that are radically bigger and radically tougher and radically more honest than anything currently going on, and that includes winning the argument in Europe, and it includes winning the argument in the rest of the world. And it includes being very clear, and I'll just give you one simple example because we're now muscle-bound by our own inability to talk honestly.

Iran produces 60 percent of its own gasoline. It produces lots of crude oil but only has one refinery. It imports 40 percent of its gasoline. The entire 60 percent is produced at one huge refinery.

In 1981, Ronald Reagan decided to break the Soviet empire. He was asked what's your vision of the Cold War. He said, "Four words: We win; they lose." He was clearly seen by The New York Times as an out-of-touch, reactionary, right-wing cowboy from California who had no idea what was going on in the world. And 11 years later the Soviet Union disappeared, but obviously that had nothing to do with Reagan because that would have meant he was right. So it's just a random accident the Soviet Union disappeared.

Part of the war we waged on the Soviet Union involved their natural gas supply because we wanted to cut off their hard currency. The Soviets were desperate to get better equipment for their pipeline. We managed to sell them through third parties very, very sophisticated American pipeline equipment, which they were thrilled to buy and thought they had pulled off a huge coup. Now we weren't playing fair. We did not tell them that the equipment was designed to blow up. One day in 1982, there was an explosion in Siberia so large that the initial reflection on the satellites looked like there was a tactical nuclear weapon. One part of the White House was genuinely worried, and the other part of the White House had to calm them down. They said, "No, no, that's our equipment blowing up."

In the 28 years since the Iranians declared war on us, in the six years since 9/11, in the months since Gen. Petraeus publicly said they are killing young Americans, we have not been able to figure out how to take down one refinery. Covertly, quietly, without overt war. And we have not been able to figure out how to use the most powerful navy in the world to simply stop the tankers and say, "Look, you want to kill young Americans, you're going to walk to the battlefield, but you're not going to ride in the car because you're not going to have any gasoline."

We don't have to be stupid. The choice is not cowardice or total war. Reagan unlocked Poland without firing a shot in an alliance with the pope, with the labor unions and with the British. We have every possibility if we're prepared to be honest to shape the world. It'll be a very big project. It's much closer to World War II than it is to anything we've tried recently. It will require real effort, real intensity and real determination. We're either going to do it now, while we're still extraordinarily powerful, or we're going to do it later under much more desperate circumstances after we've lost several cities.

We had better take this seriously because we are not very many mistakes away from a second Holocaust. Three nuclear weapons is a second Holocaust. Our enemies would like to get those weapons as soon as they can, and they promise to use them as soon as they can.

I suggest we defeat our enemies and create a different situation long before they have that power."

H/T to David Reaboi

Posted at 10:44 PM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 3609 words, total size 21 kb.

1

GM,

Is ANYBODY listening?  Is ANYBODY acting?  My observation of my fellow Americans is what they know about the world you could put in a thimble.

Worse (maybe) is the fact that most people I meet that have lots of formal education and occupy positions of influence in their communties, states and the nation, are also so ill-informed it is damned frightening.

As Gingritch says: We are Sleepwalking into a Nightmare.

America CAN lose.  Despite all our material wealth and high standard of living, we can lose.  We need to come to grips with that.

Posted by: Tango Charlie at Thursday, December 27 2007 09:24 AM (z6e/i)

2 we must step gingerly, but we must step nonetheless.

Posted by: Douglas V. Gibbs at Sunday, December 30 2007 12:18 AM (VxHOU)

3 NG has always said the things no one else dares to say. We have to credit him.

I think this speaks to something else as well: So many people think our CIA and other supposedly "covert" type operations
WILL always protect us; that we have some magical James Bond type person who will save the day...that we don't need wars
and battles anymore. Our government has secret things going on, all the time, that are preventing evils from happening.

I have a friend who says liberals still believe in Superman, and I think it's true.

I think September 11th should have woken people up to the truth. We have no one, no agency, no James Bond or Superman,
who can protect us. Some of us did wake up and have never gone back to sleep. But for the most part, the country has
forgotten and is sleeping again. I believe it will take the annihilation of a few cities to truly make the majority of people to SEE
things as they really are. And even then we won't do a thing to really go after the freaks who really want to kill our nation, our society,
our culture and our most treasured aspect- our freedom. There will be too many people who will blame America first, as always
and force the policy to work along those lines. To our end too.

Posted by: Raven at Sunday, December 30 2007 07:16 AM (c7Agr)

4

That speech alone, had Newt been a Presidential candidate, would have gotten him my vote in a heartbeat.

Posted by: Seth at Sunday, December 30 2007 07:20 AM (fyI0t)

5

GM,

Good on ya' Sir...for putting this back up.  One hopes that many will read it...slowly...and think.

Most folks, sadly, pay way too little attention to their neighborhood, town, city, state and country...not to mention the world.  The old bromide/trite saying:  The world is getting smaller - is, in very dangerous ways, becoming true.  America and Americans need to think about ways to hammer the really evil, cow the lesser evil and turn many people into admiring America and Americans vice hating us.  This can be done. I've seen it happen.

Posted by: Tad at Sunday, December 30 2007 10:33 AM (i9bb+)

6 HAPPY NEW YEAR GM FULL OF LOVE AND LAUGHTER!. ..

Posted by: Angel at Sunday, December 30 2007 05:12 PM (37mgT)

7

It may be fortunate that our young people — those who regularly go to Hollywood’s version of reality — haven’t had a cogent thought since Moby Dick was a minnow.  Otherwise, Hollywood communists may indeed have a greater influence.  But even that might be a positive result over the apathy we see among young people today.  No, I think the bad news is that our train is barreling along and the national leadership is asleep at the switch.  I’m glad to see Gingrich is addressing these issues, sorry that he isn’t posturing himself for the White House.  I do not hear any of this kind of honesty from any presidential candidates — and we might pause to ask ourselves “why?”  One answer is that our politicians assume that most Americans do not wish to address important issues.  Besides, nothing Mr. Gingrich says is suitable for a sound bite.  As Tad said the other day, if it doesn’t fit on a bumper sticker, no one will “get it.”

 

Posted by: Mustang at Monday, December 31 2007 06:44 PM (IAVYd)

8 Man Mustang did you ever hit the nail on the head.  I am starting to feel nothing but fatigue from listening to "what the candidates are saying and what they are doing, etc, etc, etc".  Personally, I think because of the nature of "campaigning", they avoid this topic for fear they will sound too "alarmist"  to the more liberal conservatives, and not tough enought to the tougher hardcore conservatives and we got to keep the 'spin doctors' employed!!!  I have felt long before 9/11 happened, that the American people don't want the truth, and if someone running for President sat down and had a "fireside chat outlining everything going on in the world, the effect it will have on our country and it's people, and what really needs to be done to solve problems now"... Well, they wouldn't get elected.  Candidates hire political spin doctors because the webs they weave, be they ever so decietful, will be what most want to hear and will be what can get them in the White House.  Sometimes I wonder if America even deserves an honest candidate that doesn't candy coat things.

Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at Thursday, January 03 2008 10:33 AM (f9Dpx)

9

GM,

This is the kind of talk that the American people and the world need to hear.  I wonder why they do not?  {Sorry I didn't see your posting earlier}.

 

Newt is a member of some of those organizations, including the CFR, which set the policies for the US and for the world.  He has messages which are designed to create inspiration for those who love America and the traditional West.  Those organizations do not themselves promote his ideas and few among the public have exposure to them.  I have to wonder how his messages deviate from the purposes of those organizations and why they are promoting alternate messages which are adversarial to the US and traditional West?  Do you have any thoughts in this regard?

 

I do think that Newt could easily become President if he were allowed support and media which were impartial and objective.  Why are we instead being given choices between doctrinaire Marxists and corporate leftist opportunists?  Why are so many of the members of those policy organizations who are Jews inviting the importation of Islamics (and other immigrants), and the socialization of America, when it is clear from messages such as Newts that this would not be in their best interests, nor the best interests of America?

 

Republicans should understand that his messages resonate, but they do not promote the messages.  They concentrate on electing the corporate left opportunists.  Has corporate greed or visions of New World leadership overtaken common sense and American vital interests as the standards for the Republican Party?  It appears that this is the case.  They seem to promote others who have policies similar to Bush which promote American interests only when it benefits corporate gluttons and which often neglects those interests which are truly vital.

 

It seems to me that the visionaries for a globalist order within the organizations are dictating what American vital interests should be and that those are not vital American interests, but interests for the promotion and execution of the New World Order.

Posted by: Flanders Fields at Sunday, January 13 2008 07:22 AM (4mIAJ)

10 Hi all. Take a two-mile walk every morning before breakfast. I am from Kenya and also now am reading in English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Unmanaged hosting services by christine anderssenwhen it comes to web hosting, some clients want complete control over their website administrative functions." Thanks in advance. Macaria.

Posted by: Macaria at Tuesday, July 14 2009 12:21 AM (VofJu)

11 Well hello guys Great job! Congrats . I am from Japan and bad know English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "After stretching to ask much, they were yet economic and used off down the stock for the drug." Thanks for the help :-), Homestead fl afb.

Posted by: Homestead fl afb at Saturday, October 17 2009 11:13 AM (luFNf)

12 Greeting. By the time I'd grown up, I naturally supposed that I'd be grown up. I am from Brazil and also now am reading in English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Nowadays, card receives by end with ink toner to document hair something." Thank you very much . Copier toner cartridges.

Posted by: Copier toner cartridges at Sunday, October 18 2009 04:11 PM (luFNf)

13 Take pandora bracelets the famous online shopping pandora bracelet website inetsilk.com for pandora sale example.

Posted by: pandora bracelets at Monday, November 01 2010 06:12 PM (Dh85A)

14 Select our highest quality Swiss watch at cheap price, and you can be the centre of attention at every occasion!

Posted by: Swiss watch at Wednesday, November 03 2010 12:52 AM (r4fUz)

15

Democratic and Republican party leaders put on their best game faces Monday, custom polo shirts embroidered custom making 11th hour arguments on the eve of midterm elections that seem certain to curb if not end Democratic control of Congress.

"We're hoping now for a fresh start with the American people," said GOP chairman custom shirts embroidered custom Michael Steele. "If we don't live up to those expectations, then we'll have a problem in two years."

His Democratic counterpart, Tim Kaine, said he believes Democrats will do better custom fleece jackets embroidered custom than some experts have contended, arguing that Republicans have been obstructionists who "can't see beyond the end of their no."

Kaine, Steele and other party leaders were asked once again on a slew of custom hoodies sweatshirt hooded custom network morning news shows to give fresh assessments of their prospects on the eve of balloting that will culminate a volatile — and possibly transcendent — campaign season.

Posted by: Stu at Monday, November 08 2010 02:43 AM (MtT9I)

16 If you want to transfer iPad to PC, here provides you two windows tools which called  iPad to PC Transfer and  iPad to Computer Transfer , for mac users,  iPad to Mac Transfer  is your best choice. 

Posted by: MKV to iPad at Thursday, December 09 2010 09:59 AM (tPLaX)

17  PDF Creator can creat PDF document files from Microsoft Office 2003/2007/2010 (Word, Excel, PowerPoint), image (JPEG, GIF, TIFF, PNG, BMP), Text, RTF, CHM, DjVu and more printable files.
        PDF Creator      
   Word to PDF Converter
  Excel to PDF Converter
   Image to PDF Converter

Posted by: wangjiming at Friday, December 17 2010 04:41 AM (W1q7p)

18 very funny! Thanks for sharing!Don't forget the things you once you owned. Treasure thethings youcan't get. Don't give up the things that belong to you and keep thoselost things in memory

Posted by: jersey at Sunday, June 12 2011 02:44 AM (+/uBJ)

19 Point on the feet & legs are also used as a way of freeing up the circuit of energy & blood inside the meridian. This meridian travels around the body from the eye towards the little toe, travelling on the side of the back on the way.



Therapies for example Chiropractic, Osteopathy and Physiotherapy are popular treatments for back pain. acupuncture infertility is less well-known as a treatment, nevertheless it includes a unique capability to reach nerves lying deep within the muscles from the body.

Posted by: acupuncture for infertility fl at Sunday, June 26 2011 09:47 PM (sW4U2)

20 What r those dots on his face?

Posted by: 传奇私服 at Thursday, September 01 2011 08:56 PM (Y540q)

Hide Comments | Add Comment