January 26, 2006
Kerry (and his partner in crime - T. Kennedy) have decided that they would like to filibuster the vote on the nomination of Samuel Alito to the United States Supreme Court. Senator(s) can you say STUPID? You two have got to be the dumbest of the dumb.
From the CNN folk comes this:
Sources close to Kerry, who lost to Bush in the 2004 race, told CNN that the senator was calling colleagues from Switzerland, where he was attending the World Economic Forum. He announced his decision to support a filibuster Wednesday at a meeting of his Democratic colleagues.The White House believes Alito's supporters have the 60 votes they need to block any filibuster, spokesman Steve Schmidt said, and suggested that Kerry's move was designed to buttress a possible 2008 presidential run.
The Washington Post's Charles Babington reports:
Several prominent Democratic senators called for a filibuster of Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s Supreme Court nomination yesterday, exposing a deep divide in the party even as they delighted the party's liberal base.The filibuster's supporters -- including Sens. John F. Kerry and Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts -- acknowledged that the bid is likely to fail and that Alito is virtually certain to be confirmed Tuesday. But they said extended debate may draw more Americans' attention to Alito's conservative stands on abortion, civil rights, presidential powers and other matters.
"Judge Alito will take America backward, especially when it comes to civil rights and discrimination laws," Kerry said in a statement issued by his office. He added: "It's our right and our responsibility to oppose him vigorously and to fight against this radical upending of the Supreme Court."
The Democrats are divided? News to me! On the other hand, that famous entertainer Will Rogers once noted: "I don't belong to any organized political party. I'm a Democrat."
Senator Kerry, you greatly remind me of a saying by Dietrich Bonhöffer:
Folly is a more dangerous enemy to the good than evil. One can protest against evil; it can be unmasked and, if need be, prevented by force. Evil always carries the seeds of its own destruction... Against folly we have no such defense. Neither protests nor force can touch it; reasoning is no use...So the fool, as distinct from the scoundrel, is completely self-satisfied; in fact, he can easily become dangerous, as it does not take much to make him aggressive. A fool must therefore be treated more cautiously than a scoundrel.
H/T to Stop the ACLU
Posted at 11:59 PM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 471 words, total size 3 kb.
Excuse me while I, too, have a good old fashioned "rip-roaring belly laugh".
With every word that comes from their mouths is confirmation that they still don't understand what the Supreme Court's role in government is.
Their very actions belie their every word. They do not, under any circumstances, want a Justice who will look objectively at any future case which involves the word "abortion". They do not want the issue to ever be visited again. Settled law indeed. Suppose we espoused that very ideal in 1972 as Roe v. Wade was under consideration to be heard by the Supreme Court? The illegality of abortion was certainly settled law before that. For two centuries.
They do not want a black, female or hispanic Justice unless their name is followed with a capital (D) and the assurance that they will reject any further such cases.
These two, in particular, are hypocrites of the highest order. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
Dang I'm long-winded, aren't I?
Posted by: Oyster at Friday, January 27 2006 02:21 AM (YudAC)
They are rather like the entertainment biz, the media, and many academics. They are wrapped in the respectability of worthy institutions and then they go on with mostly "bumper sticker" comments from the forum provided by those who voted for them. Gad.
My spouse, VERY MISTAKENLY, received a mailing from Teddy Kennedy yesterday. It was one of those that was asking for money to push the Senate back into the Dem's camp. She read it aloud to me. Lots and lots of allegations and statements of fact. Not one single piece of evidence about how GW Bush really is the devil, as he so claimed...in so many words.
Do you think that these guys have actually convinced themselves of all that they say? Or are they knowingly lying?
Posted by: tad at Friday, January 27 2006 03:03 AM (0IiUT)
Posted by: Louise at Friday, January 27 2006 04:10 AM (nZJPq)
Posted by: Raven at Friday, January 27 2006 08:25 AM (KSiCl)
Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at Friday, January 27 2006 11:13 AM (bfKow)
Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at Friday, January 27 2006 11:18 AM (bfKow)
He knows the filibuster is a loser - but that doesn't matter because he can turn to the Dems in Iowa and say: "See, I am a reliable liberal who has the courage to speak truth to power!". And he gets bonus points for also being able to play the vicitm ("Look how they treated me!").
Which, for me, only makes him less qualified to serve (and more disgusting), but if he ends up as the nominee then I predict four more years of Republican control of theExecutive branch, which is good.
Posted by: too many steves at Saturday, January 28 2006 01:17 AM (0QaNZ)
In truth though, I think the observations on Kerry are a bit off. I think he is delusional ... because he came close in 2004, he thinks he has a real shot at the goal in 2008. Even Gore had better sense than to lose twice. That he came as close as he did in 2004 is a reflection of antipathy for Bush rather than empathy for Kerry. The Democrats won't go down that road again and Kerry would do well to shore up his Massachusettes base ... methinks Massachusettes voters are getting a bit tired of having two clowns representing them in the Senate.
Posted by: Well_Seasoned at Saturday, January 28 2006 02:23 AM (74qDR)
Posted by: Oyster at Saturday, January 28 2006 06:05 AM (YudAC)
Good will come of his folly, though, if the enough Democratic senators repudiate him and his unprincipled action to enable the cloture motion to pass by 70+ yes votes. Unfortunately, a number seem to be bending to the wind of opportunism and pandering (such as Feinstein) and appear determined to jump off the cliff. This could become as much of a defining moment for the Democratic party as for Kerry.
AVI, from a Google search, it appears that the GM's Bonhoeffer quote comes from his Letters and Papers from Prison, and in particular from an essay therein called "After Ten Years..."
Posted by: civil truth at Saturday, January 28 2006 09:38 AM (2eZsU)
AIN'T THAT THE TRUTH!
Posted by: L.B. at Saturday, January 28 2006 10:22 AM (Vje4V)
I am particularly delighted that in a world that is often uncivil, GM remains civil to all...unless they cross boundries of taste and decency that are really beyond question.
Well, applause for GM and his many cohorts. I look forward to many more thought provoking comments.
Plaudits and Applause,
Tad
Posted by: tad at Saturday, January 28 2006 03:43 PM (ccSyJ)
Posted by: LASunsett at Sunday, January 29 2006 02:16 AM (1gQz+)
Posted by: GM Roper at Sunday, January 29 2006 03:21 AM (0CqNu)
Posted by: tad at Monday, January 30 2006 01:25 AM (oKpHD)
Posted by: Prima at Wednesday, July 15 2009 10:00 AM (VofJu)
Posted by: Fantom vacuum cleaner parts at Saturday, August 08 2009 01:03 AM (bZ8te)
Posted by: Hardi siding at Monday, August 10 2009 08:26 AM (bZ8te)
Posted by: Teeth whitening at dentist at Thursday, August 13 2009 10:33 PM (bZ8te)
Posted by: Stock trading advice at Sunday, October 11 2009 03:34 PM (kg/hr)
Posted by: Rosetta lenoire at Saturday, October 17 2009 12:20 PM (kg/hr)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








