June 26, 2008

Supreme Court Rulings: Today vs. Obama's Ideal Justices

The Supreme Court just ruled that the Second Amendment means what it says and not what liberals want it to say or to not say.  Individual Americans do have the right to personally own guns and without being associated with a militia.

Now, since the President is the one who appoints the Supreme Court justices subject to confirmation by the Senate, it's important in a Presidential election to consider the types of justices that a candidate would appoint.

Our buddy, Delftsman, provides a clue as to what type of justices that Sen. Obama would appoint by providing a comparison of Obama's ideal justice to the oath that a such justice must make.  After you read it, you shouldn't have any question as to how Obama's justices would have distorted the Second Amendment and other rulings had they been sitting on the bench today.  Consider that for the future.  

Here's Delftman's link:  Obama=Poor Judgement... 

Now, to liberals who think that only government should own guns....

            BACK OFF!!

Authored by Woody

 

Posted at 10:50 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Woody, I think you misquoted Yosimite Sam... that should read "Back off ya dad-blasted varmit!"

Posted by: GM Roper at Thursday, June 26 2008 02:27 PM (1fjXG)

2 mulberry outlet mulberry outlet mulberry sale mulberry sale mulberry bags mulberry bags

Posted by: mulberry outlet at Friday, December 23 2011 07:56 PM (qaZgC)

3 Thanks

Posted by: mulberry outlet at Tuesday, April 24 2012 05:40 AM (AAfo7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






20kb generated in 0.125 seconds; 96 queries returned 223 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.