July 18, 2007
The Republicans in the Senate (and elsewhere) have stated that this was a useless political stunt by the Democrats who continue to harp on an issue that they do not have the power to change. But, I disagree, the move by the Democrats has two purposes, one of which is not intended, but more about that later. The primary purpose of this "useless" debate is to sway public opinion for a period of time long enough so that the Republicans will eventually "give up" and support the Dems in their efforts to be the de facto "Commander in Chief." And, if the Republicans are as spineless as they have been in the past, it might just work.
The other purpose that I alluded to above is that this really does show how the Democrats are less interested in solving this issue (pull out vs. come up with a real plan to win the war against the Islamofascist elements of Islam) than in giving in to a mistaken interpretation of the mandate of the last election. The Democrats truly believe that they were elected to get us out of Iraq, but the reality is that it was more a vote against entrenched Republican spend-a-holics who had the taint (real and imagined) of corruption. That the Democrats in congress are equally corrupt, if not decidedly more so, does not seem to have entered the minds of the electorate. And, I have to hand it to the Dems, they did a masterful job of painting the Republicans as do nothing but spend, hand money over to corrupt lobbyist like Jack Abramoff and pseudo-pedophiles like the congressman from Florida.
Be that as it may, Republicans voted Dem in a fairly large number of places electing an awful lot of Blue Dog Democrats to replace Republicans, but the truth of the matter is that those individuals are going to be "at risk" come the next election and if the Democrats continue to play their silly little games they will loose out in the Senate as well. And, don't think America doesn't remember and think about comments from idiots like Harry Reid (D. Nevada) stating that the war will equal votes for Democrats.
In fact, I think I just may encourage Democrats to keep on doing what they are doing. It will just prove how insane the current Democrat leadership is; the definition of insanity being "To keep doing the same thing expecting a different result."
Score card: Reps = 1; Dems = 0
Pitiful, just pitiful!
Update: Fausta sees it the way I do, but she has photographic evidence of Harry Reid reaching for Nirvana. Go and read the whole thing.
Posted at 05:29 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 527 words, total size 3 kb.
I look at what's going on in Iraq and say the same thing... except, of course, I'm referring to Republicans.
Posted by: e. nonee moose at Wednesday, July 18 2007 04:57 AM (ub2kI)
Now, take a look at the anti-war bills the house and senate have tried to pass under Democrat Party leadership. All basically the same thing with the same result - going down to defeat and the single attempt that they could pass was defeated via a veto and they couldn't override that.
Same thing? Not even close.
Posted by: GM Roper at Wednesday, July 18 2007 06:41 AM (CglRh)
Posted by: Sonnabend at Wednesday, July 18 2007 08:32 AM (SoDfe)
You know that Churchill once said that " democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others that have been tried'. The more I see of the ongoing farce that 'politics' has become, the more convinced I am that we just have not been trying hard enough on the 'alternative' front. This is just ghastly.
Supposedly a people get the government they deserve ---methinks someone has collected some very bad Karma somewhere down the line. Very very very bad Karma.
But that is not why I really appreciate this posting. It gives me a chance to now relay this little gem from the Washington Post. As much as I usually HATE the media, I salute the writer of this article without reservations. And it's Dana Milbank so imagine my surprise.
Talk about painting with words.
The most active figures in the Capitol were the antiwar demonstrators who, after hours outside at a rally, formed a pungent line to enter the public gallery.
Priceless.
Full Article Here.
Posted by: dougf at Wednesday, July 18 2007 11:44 AM (16GPT)
Posted by: Angel at Wednesday, July 18 2007 12:28 PM (ZkvQt)
Posted by: bishopdic at Wednesday, July 18 2007 02:06 PM (uJwiD)
Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at Wednesday, July 18 2007 04:13 PM (YQFD4)
If we stay we just stoke the fire as our presence in Iraq is Al-Qaida's best recruiting tool and also we risk war engulfing the entire Middle East. I know many of you would love for us to open up a big ol' can of "Whoop-Ass" on Iran but, trust me, that's really not a great idea at the moment. Unless a draft and paying $120 a barrel for oil seems like a good idea to you. And dead people... a lot of dead people. If you like dead bodies then, yeah, war with Iran seems like a great idea.
Posted by: e. nonee moose at Thursday, July 19 2007 09:14 AM (zxLum)
Posted by: Camelai at Friday, July 17 2009 02:16 PM (2r5gt)
Posted by: Rosetta stone free trial at Saturday, October 17 2009 02:45 PM (PS2kx)
Posted by: Find peoples email addresses at Wednesday, November 11 2009 06:45 PM (GxwvN)
Posted by: timberland mens boots at Wednesday, November 30 2011 12:27 AM (4GpTO)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








