January 14, 2006
The analogy between a circus and the Alito hearings is an apt one I think, given the clown like performances of certain members of the Judiciary Committee. I won't mention their names, but their initials are Ted (Chappaquiddick) Kennedy:
In an era when the White House is abusing power, is excusing and authorizing torture and is spying on American citizens, I find Judge Alito's support for an all-powerful executive branch to be genuinely troubling..."Joseph (Who thinks the Constitution requires two female members) Biden:
And it's also important to note that you're slated to replace the first woman ever nominated to the Supreme Court. We can pretend that's not the fact but it is. And through no fault of your own [though I'm holding you responsible - snark added], we're cutting the number of women in half on the court."Charles (Please Don't Indict Me) Schumer:
This controversial nominee, who would make the court less diverse and far more conservative, will get very careful scrutiny from the Senate and from the American people."Patrick (Damn it, I want a liberal judge) Leahy:
The American people deserve a Supreme Court Justice who inspires confidence that he, or she, will not be beholden to the President but will be immune to pressures from the Government or from partisan interests [emphasis added as a snark]."Diane (I don't care what Ginsberg said, how will YOU answer) Feinstine:
However, in 1985 you clearly stated that you believed Roe should be overturned and that the Constitution does not protect a woman’s right to choose. Despite voting to sustain Roe while on the Third Circuit, your opinions also raise questions about how you would rule if not bound by precedent. I will be interested to learn about your legal and personal views on Roe and the Constitutional right to privacy as you see it today."and Dick (Damn Those Nazis) Durban:
Your record raises troubling questions about whether you appreciate the checks and balances in our Constitution � the careful efforts of our Founding Fathers to protect us from a government or a president determined to seize too much power over our lives..."In room 216, the Senate Judiciary Committee in the guise of it's Democrat members participated in what could be termed illegal torture of a United States citizen. Alito was in a room, hot via overcrowding, blazing lights aimed at the responder, torturous and repetitious meanderings from the bloviatings of said Democrats [equal to, for sure of blaring rap "music"], sitting in an uncomfortable position for hours and hours and hours with no relief - not able to get up and walk around, not able to relax and having to pay attention to those who do not have his best interests at heart (let alone the best interests of the country).
Perhaps, the denouement of this whole Democratic engineered farce will be the final vote. I'm predicting that the committee vote will be along party lines and the final vote in the Senate will be something like 78-22 with precisely the same idjits voting against Alito as voted against Roberts. These guys just don't learn. There are consequences folks for elections and this last election put a Republican in the Whitehouse with the ability to appoint judges and (finally) the willingness to appoint conservative judges. Cry all you want, the people see through you and know that your grasp of reality is tenuous at best. Carol Dean Thomas, a strongly liberal attorney probably said it best (in the NY Times no less):
The president took the high road on this nomination. He juggled his politics and his public relations, and while I don't like either, I have to be grateful for the quality of lawyer, and individual, who emerged as the nominee.We have to decide whether the unfortunate tradition begun with Robert Bork's nomination should be continued indefinitely or whether, with the wisdom of hindsight, we exhume it only when absolutely warranted. Liberals among us have got to get real - to press for the finest jurists a conservative administration is willing to offer, and to spend our capital in that pursuit." [emphasis added]
Posted at 03:27 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 730 words, total size 5 kb.
Ouch, that's GOTTA hurt the Dimmies...
Oh well...
Posted by: TexasFred at Saturday, January 14 2006 07:00 AM (qX3iX)
on the other side of that equation is "We are increasing the men on SCOTUS by 20%" So who is the loser? The men....it is a 20% vs. 50%...so the disparity is 60%.
(hey, if that fuzzy math works for school budgets, [we didn't get the increase we wanted, so we LOST money], it should work for other things.
Posted by: kender at Saturday, January 14 2006 08:13 AM (k5SaN)
Posted by: Raven at Saturday, January 14 2006 11:28 AM (QopLx)
Posted by: tad at Saturday, January 14 2006 11:43 AM (0IiUT)
Posted by: civil truth at Saturday, January 14 2006 01:35 PM (2eZsU)
Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at Saturday, January 14 2006 04:09 PM (bfKow)
Posted by: Raven at Saturday, January 14 2006 04:11 PM (xxyjU)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








