November 07, 2006

Captain Ed Gets It, Will America?

Captain Ed quotes Michael Kinsley:

[...] For national security in general, the Democrats' plan is so according-to-type that you cringe with embarrassment: It's mostly about new cash benefits for veterans. Regarding Iraq specifically, the Democrats' plan has two parts. First, they want Iraqis to "assum[e] primary responsibility for securing and governing their country." Then they want "responsible redeployment" (great euphemism) of American forces.

Older readers may recognize this formula. It's Vietnamization—the Nixon-Kissinger plan for extracting us from a previous mistake. But Vietnamization was not a plan for victory. It was a plan for what was called "peace with honor" and is now known as "defeat."

Then El Captitan adds (and be sure and read the whole thing):
[...] In fact, as Kinsley notes, the Democrats have no plans for anything other than their normal asset redistributions to special-interest groups and selected victim classes. They want small businesses to shoulder the cost of a 50% health-care tax, which they think will solve the health-care crisis. It's more likely to start a small-business crisis as firms collapse under the weight of the new costs. Since the engine of economic growth lies in small businesses and start-ups, the effect will be to start a recession and to drive people into larger corporations for their investments. Instead of building a more robust middle class, the Democrats will remove competition and escalate centralization of economic power.

Also, Kinsley also discovers that for all of the talk about fiscal discipline and responsibility in this election cycle, the Democrats did not specify a single new revenue source for all of their new programs. They rail about the profligate Republicans, in an attempt to convince fiscal conservatives to consider the Democrats as their own "new direction", and talk a lot about "pay as you go" as the principle for budgeting. However, they leave the reader with no clue as to how the Democrats will find the money for all of their giveaways and redistributions ... which means that they have some tax increases that they don't want to mention.

The Democrats offer defeat, retreat, and an economic collapse darned near complete. Even Kinsley can't put a good face on this fiasco. No wonder Nancy Pelosi has been hiding for the last week.

Sounds right to me!

Vote, and vote Republican!

Filed under: Elections

Posted at 01:00 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 3 kb.

1 A song for the Democrats and the possible new chairman of the House and Ways Committee.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WeiaAA1GmU

Posted by: Woody at Tuesday, November 07 2006 02:59 AM (v5VVJ)

2 Older readers may recognize this formula. It's Vietnamization—the Nixon-Kissinger plan for extracting us from a previous mistake. But Vietnamization was not a plan for victory. It was a plan for what was called "peace with honor" and is now known as "defeat."

We are already well into the "Iraqi-ization" phase of the current war. Why does Cap'm Ed pretend it's a Democrat idea? It was a Republican idea the first time around and its a Republican idea now.

Posted by: e. nonee moose at Tuesday, November 07 2006 07:24 AM (dlFaD)

3 Moose, it was a bad call then, it's a bad call now.

Americans are essentially swayed by the media (on both sides) and when the "news" is consistently bad (Tet - remember) the public backs off and it doesn't seem to matter what the facts are either way.

Posted by: GM at Tuesday, November 07 2006 07:36 AM (DQHjM)

4 moose, I hope you are more than half wrong on this, but your rightness grows each year.

To the main point. The Democrat plan is to get elected. That's it.

Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at Tuesday, November 07 2006 12:42 PM (1w197)

5 It is wrong, I suggest, timberland hiking boots is a misreading of the Constitution for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that discount timberland boots should be removed from office. The Constitution doesn't say that. The powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon timberland boot. The division between the two branches of the legislature, the House and the Senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge, the framers of timberland classic boat shoes were very astute.ljp

Posted by: womens timberland boots at Saturday, November 05 2011 01:10 AM (zhRR6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






21kb generated in 0.0526 seconds; 96 queries returned 184 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.