September 07, 2007
Then, Jobs and his crew look to take in MORE money with holiday spending so they drop the prices some $200.00 and those that spent $599.00 were LIVID. Now, any one who buys electronics knows about price drops, a very basic 66 hertz computer from Hewlett Packard cost almost $2000.00 in 1994 and now you can get one a "zillion" times faster, far more powerful, with a relative HUGE amount of memory and hard drives in the terrabit range for less than $1500.00 Ram that used to cost hundreds of dollars for a 256 bit chip now costs less than $100.00 for a gigabyte chip.
So, why are these folks griping because Apple dropped it's price? All they had to do was wait a little bit befor buying. But noooooooooooo! And now they want some money back. Give me a break!
Posted at 02:25 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 266 words, total size 2 kb.
I wonder how some of those people feel after buying a house and then finding that the prices went UP after a few months. They probably wanted to give the builder some more money or a coupon--to make it fair, of course.
Poloroid did it best with their Instamatic (a camera that develops the picture within a minute!). The price was high at first, over $1,000 as I remember. After they had saturated the high income market layer, Poloroid dropped the price for the next income level and so on until the camera was $19.95--my level.
Posted by: Woody at Saturday, September 08 2007 02:41 AM (Eb/8J)
As to the price drop, I'm still annoyed that I can't buy Microsoft stock in 1976. Or that I didn't warn Bill Lee to stop pitching junk to Perez in 1975.
It's called real life. People should get a grip.
Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at Saturday, September 08 2007 11:12 AM (YQFD4)
I taped Lucille Ball and Henry Fonda in the delightful film "Yours Mine and Ours." For the cost, I could have rented a theater and a limo and taken all my friends to see it instead.
After I realized how expensive that mistake was, I stopped being an early adapter. I'm still waiting for cell phone service to drop the cost before I get my first one.
I'll still buy the fastest computer, but I won't buy it the first day, or month, or quarter it comes on the market and I won't buy a new one for at least three years.
Posted by: Mike's America at Saturday, September 08 2007 11:20 AM (/qpbM)
Posted by: earl west at Sunday, September 09 2007 12:49 AM (pJhom)
Posted by: Oyster at Sunday, September 09 2007 11:35 PM (YudAC)
Being one of those folks who misses the era of the rotary dial phone and the busy signal, I have always been a mega-late purchaser. Beta Max was a distant memory before I owned my first VHS deck, I was probably the last person on earth to buy my first CD player and the only reason I went to DVD was that Virgin and fellow travellers stopped selling films in VHS. As long as my 2+ year old Dell Inspiron notebook functions, it will not be replaced, breath-taking new technology notwithstanding.
It's an interesting, though to me inexplicable, trait of human nature that so many idiots feel they have to be the first-in-line to possess "the latest technology", as though if they don't get it "now", it will go away.
As far back as the advents of hand calculators, digital and liquid crystal watches, people were rushing out to pay four digits for stuff that would, in short order, be available for less than fifty bucks.
"Free digital watch with a test drive..."
Given the uniformity of all precedents, if they're stupid enough to buy new tech products the second they emerge, they need to pay the stupid tax.
Posted by: Seth at Monday, September 10 2007 01:03 AM (3plu5)
Apple courts these gadget-heads and offers them an informal deal about prices. They broke with custom and customers felt betrayed. That's what this is about.
Posted by: Mavis Beacon at Monday, September 10 2007 05:16 AM (PZWdU)
Posted by: mariah at Saturday, January 08 2011 01:25 AM (72uSD)
Posted by: Sex medicine at Tuesday, January 18 2011 11:11 PM (1pVLn)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








